stakeholder 5
Philanthropies
Philanthropies
Philanthropies
Who are they?
Altruistic private organisations, foundations and trusts targeted towards the development and implementation of DPI.
What do they do?
Provide grants for a fixed period of time, support the development of basic infrastructure, and promote private sector innovation.
Examples
Philanthropies such as the Gates Foundation, Omidyar Network and Tata Trusts are funders of MOSIP, which provides open source technology for countries to build digital ID systems.
Filter By:
all
Law
Policy
Technical Standard
Operational Guideline
PRINCIPLE 1: Build for inclusion, accessibility, and equity
Operational Guidelines
Invest in capacity building and awareness initiatives
P1.T2/O
This entails promoting awareness and intuitive designs for users, and training and capacity building of operators of the system. This could take the form of training initiatives and skill development workshops for operators, as well as investments towards awareness campaigns and education initiatives for users.
Rationale
Capacity building ensures that both the users and operators can engage with DPI effectively. To this end, the operators and regulators of the DPI must invest in capacity building as a multipolar process to include institutional, tech and administrative dimensions. This empowers users and operators to engage meaningfully and derive maximum value from the infrastructure, while also allowing for a seamless integration of digital systems.
Practice
India:
UPI: NPCI Circular with recommendations on simplification of user-side flows in apps for easy onboarding
Philippines:
PhilSys: The identity system PhilSys is backed by a law which states that one of its objectives is strengthening financial inclusion and reducing corruption.
Stakeholders
PUBLIC SECTOR
PHILANTHROPIES
CSOs and END USERS
Lifecycle
DEVELOPMENT
DEPLOYMENT
ADAPTATION
Tool
2
PRINCIPLE 3: Promote collaboration
and co-creation towards and public benefit
Tool
4
Operational Guidelines
Establish diverse expert committees and advisory boards with stakeholder representation
P3.T4/O
This entails the constitution of expert committees with broad stakeholder representation. The governance framework shall strive to safeguard the independence of these committees and include setting clear terms of reference on powers and functions, providing adequate resources and support to enforce.
Rationale
DPIs are complex systems that require expertise from various domains such as technology, policy, economics, social sciences, and ethics. By constituting expert committees, DPI can leverage technical knowledge and valuable perspectives for guidance on critical issues related to the development, operation, and regulation of DPIs. These processes also instil a sense of ownership and accountability in the governance of DPIs.
Practice
India:
ABDM: The ABDM governing board has mandates to include two domain experts from fields such as administrative, insurance, public and private Health care providers, economics, public health, management etc.
Ethiopia:
DAAS: The Digital Agriculture Advisory Services (DAAS) project in Ethiopia is a consortium-led initiative by Digital Green, with the Ministry of Agriculture set to manage the key FarmStack component, aligning with national agricultural strategies.
Stakeholders
PUBLIC SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR
OPEN-SOURCE COMMUNITIES
DEVELOPMENT ACTORS
PHILANTHROPIES
Lifecycle
CONCEPTION
DEVELOPMENT
DEPLOYMENT
ADAPTATION
Principle 4: Ensure transparency and accountability with appropriate
grievance redressal mechanisms
Law
Require disclosures on appointments and clarity on delegation of authority
P4.T4/L
This entails publishing the criteria for the appointment and delegation of authority, their roles, responsibilities, and the decision-making processes they oversee to provide visibility and prevent undue influence on the governance structure of DPI. This report should include details on the appointment criteria, the process followed, and any conflicts of interest that were appropriately addressed.
Rationale
Establishing definite criteria for appointments and delegation of authority ensures that qualified individuals with the necessary expertise and integrity are entrusted with positions of responsibility concerning the DPI in question. These processes can allow stakeholders to scrutinise the decision-making processes and hold accountable those entrusted with the authority to operate and govern a DPI.
Practice
India:
ONDC: ONDC publishes an extensive repository of the various committees and councils, and detailed network policies on the roles, processes, and service devolution mechanics on their website.
Brazil:
The role of Brazil’s central bank, Banco Central do Brasil (BCB), towards the supervision and operation of Pix has been laid down on their website.
Stakeholders
PUBLIC SECTOR
DEVELOPMENT ACTORS
PHILANTHROPIES
CSOs and END USERS
Lifecycle
DEPLOYMENT
Tool
4
Filter By:
all
Law
Policy
Technical Standard
Operational Guideline
PRINCIPLE 1: Build for inclusion, accessibility, and equity
Operational Guidelines
Invest in capacity building and awareness initiatives
P1.T2/O
This entails promoting awareness and intuitive designs for users, and training and capacity building of operators of the system. This could take the form of training initiatives and skill development workshops for operators, as well as investments towards awareness campaigns and education initiatives for users.
Rationale
Capacity building ensures that both the users and operators can engage with DPI effectively. To this end, the operators and regulators of the DPI must invest in capacity building as a multipolar process to include institutional, tech and administrative dimensions. This empowers users and operators to engage meaningfully and derive maximum value from the infrastructure, while also allowing for a seamless integration of digital systems.
Practice
India:
UPI: NPCI Circular with recommendations on simplification of user-side flows in apps for easy onboarding
Philippines:
PhilSys: The identity system PhilSys is backed by a law which states that one of its objectives is strengthening financial inclusion and reducing corruption.
Stakeholders
PUBLIC SECTOR
PHILANTHROPIES
CSOs and END USERS
Lifecycle
DEVELOPMENT
DEPLOYMENT
ADAPTATION
Tool
2
PRINCIPLE 3: Promote collaboration
and co-creation towards and public benefit
Tool
4
Operational Guidelines
Establish diverse expert committees and advisory boards with stakeholder representation
P3.T4/O
This entails the constitution of expert committees with broad stakeholder representation. The governance framework shall strive to safeguard the independence of these committees and include setting clear terms of reference on powers and functions, providing adequate resources and support to enforce.
Rationale
DPIs are complex systems that require expertise from various domains such as technology, policy, economics, social sciences, and ethics. By constituting expert committees, DPI can leverage technical knowledge and valuable perspectives for guidance on critical issues related to the development, operation, and regulation of DPIs. These processes also instil a sense of ownership and accountability in the governance of DPIs.
Practice
India:
ABDM: The ABDM governing board has mandates to include two domain experts from fields such as administrative, insurance, public and private Health care providers, economics, public health, management etc.
Ethiopia:
DAAS: The Digital Agriculture Advisory Services (DAAS) project in Ethiopia is a consortium-led initiative by Digital Green, with the Ministry of Agriculture set to manage the key FarmStack component, aligning with national agricultural strategies.
Stakeholders
PUBLIC SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR
OPEN-SOURCE COMMUNITIES
DEVELOPMENT ACTORS
PHILANTHROPIES
Lifecycle
CONCEPTION
DEVELOPMENT
DEPLOYMENT
ADAPTATION
Principle 4: Ensure transparency and accountability with appropriate
grievance redressal mechanisms
Law
Require disclosures on appointments and clarity on delegation of authority
P4.T4/L
This entails publishing the criteria for the appointment and delegation of authority, their roles, responsibilities, and the decision-making processes they oversee to provide visibility and prevent undue influence on the governance structure of DPI. This report should include details on the appointment criteria, the process followed, and any conflicts of interest that were appropriately addressed.
Rationale
Establishing definite criteria for appointments and delegation of authority ensures that qualified individuals with the necessary expertise and integrity are entrusted with positions of responsibility concerning the DPI in question. These processes can allow stakeholders to scrutinise the decision-making processes and hold accountable those entrusted with the authority to operate and govern a DPI.
Practice
India:
ONDC: ONDC publishes an extensive repository of the various committees and councils, and detailed network policies on the roles, processes, and service devolution mechanics on their website.
Brazil:
The role of Brazil’s central bank, Banco Central do Brasil (BCB), towards the supervision and operation of Pix has been laid down on their website.
Stakeholders
PUBLIC SECTOR
DEVELOPMENT ACTORS
PHILANTHROPIES
CSOs and END USERS
Lifecycle
DEPLOYMENT
Tool
4
Note: This tool is best viewed ON a desktop/laptop
Aapti Institute
37, Aga Abbas Ali Rd, Halasuru
Yellappa Chetty Layout, Sivanchetti Gardens Bengaluru, Karnataka 560042
For inquiries
2024 Aapti All right reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Cookies Settings
Note: This tool is best viewed ON a desktop/laptop
Aapti Institute
37, Aga Abbas Ali Rd, Halasuru
Yellappa Chetty Layout, Sivanchetti Gardens Bengaluru, Karnataka 560042
For inquiries
2024 Aapti All right reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Cookies Settings
Note: This tool is best viewed ON a desktop/laptop
Aapti Institute
37, Aga Abbas Ali Rd, Halasuru
Yellappa Chetty Layout, Sivanchetti Gardens Bengaluru, Karnataka 560042
For inquiries
2024 Aapti All right reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Cookies Settings
